Sorry for the long absence. I’ve been mired in the longest losing streak of my fledgling poker career.
It started out a couple months ago with a couple of bad beats. In a row. I’ll never forget it. Dude called (yes – he called!) my all in bet fishing for an inside straight. And hits it. What happened next is best summarized in this table:
| Dates used: | 11/1/2011 – 2/1/2012 |
| Total sessions: | 55 |
| Winning sessions: | 13 |
| Average win: | $141.00 |
| Losing sessions: | 41 |
| Average loss: | $107.00 |
| Total win/loss for period: | ($2,551.00) |
Grunch!
What the table does not tell you is *how* I went about losing all this money. I think it’s best summarized by a guy who’s opinion in the poker world I respect – Roger Rodd. Roger used to spend his life playing poker. These days he teaches a poker class at Commerce Casino and is a stand up comedian (go figure). Anyways – one thing that Roger always says is “It starts with bad luck, and progresses to bad luck’s twin brother – bad play.” The trick is figuring out how to recognize which twin you are dealing with.
Well – it’s taken me a while. But maybe, just maybe, I‘ve figured out how to tell. In any case, I’ve figured out what I need to do to deal with the situation:
- First – take some time off. Really take some time off. Quit reading about poker, quit thinking about poker, quit talking about poker.
- Second – if you lose *any* money in a hand, record it. Then go home and analyze it.
- Third – do not play poker until you are able to complete this sentence – “I could have played that hand better if….”.
In my case, if I *honestly* can’t answer question #3 – then I’m dealing with bad luck. But you know what? Most of the time I *can* answer the question….
Here’s a prime example from a hand a week or so ago:
Situation: I am in position heads up in a pot against a recreational fish in the BB. He has gone through a couple of 50BB buyins already in my standard 1/2 NLHE game. He has recently gotten lucky and has chipped up to about $150 or so. I have $180.
There has been a limper or two and I look down to ![]()
. I raise to $8. The BB calls. We’re heads up.
Flop: ![]()
![]()
This is a pretty good flop for me. BB checks. I bet $15 into a $15 pot. BB calls.
Turn:
. BB checks again. I bet $40. BB now check raises all-in. Without thinking I call.
BB turns over ![]()
for the turned two pair. And I take back the $30 that I have left.
So – let’s go to question #3…. “I could have played that hand better if….”
- I could have raised more preflop I suppose. However, that folds out weak Queens (QJ, QT, etc.)that I want calling my raise.
- The key is the turn. No recreational player is check raising all in without a hand that he or she perceives as the nuts. Period. I should recognize the CRAI as that and should have folded.
Now, a lot of people would say “That’s not true! He could be doing that with KQ!” Well, not really, I think if he has KQ in this spot, he calls my bet, because after all, “He may have AQ!”
Here’s another from a couple weeks ago:
Situation: I’m playing shorthanded at a 1/2 table with some unknowns. I am on the button and have around $250. Villain in this hand is the Small Blind who starts the hand with around $70.
I look down to ![]()
. I raise to $12. SB calls. UTG (who has limped) calls.
Flop: ![]()
![]()
. SB checks, UTG checks. I bet $15. SB check raises to $30. UTG folds.
At this point I am really confused. What range is he check min raising with here? Not to mention, his raise leaves him with about $25 behind. I should not even be contemplating a fold. But I do.
So let’s look at the question – “I could have played that hand better if….”
This one’s easy. CALL! He is NOT doing this exclusively with 66, 33 or 55. And 54 probably isn’t in his opening range! Sooo many hands are there – A6, small pocket pairs, etc. etc. When I stoved this hand after the fact, even with sets as part of his range, I still have 40% equity. And I fold for an extra $25?!?!?!?!
And I wonder why I was on a multi-month losing streak.